Skip to content
OpenCells

Overlay · Antisemitism

Antisemitism

IHRA examples can recharacterize political speech (including some Israel-related speech) as evidence of discriminatory intent. Institutions must police. The test is contextual. Official US theory remains hostile environment / deliberate indifference.

Back to overlays

Supported

Working definition (IHRA) imported into US civil-rights tools. Also a charging theory under existing hate statutes. Not a US listed-speech offence.

Not Israel §24. Not a hidden listed-speech offence. Motive and overbreadth remain Disputed.

Worked example on this desk. The machinery, not the unique evil of the sticker, is what can spread.

Creep row

Classification by sector. Live means a quoted instrument. Architecture means the statute already covers the sector. Unproven means no pack.
OverlayCriminal speechDirect offenceEducationSchools / campusEmploymentWorkplace dutyPlatformsOSA / DSA / duty of careOther fundedHousing, health, transitImmigrationStatus barPolice recordingBelow-crime incidentsProgrammePrevent / exchanges
AntisemitismLive, citedLive, citedDocumented hopPointed, not quotedArchitecture onlyUnprovenPointed, not quotedPointed, not quoted
  • Live, cited
  • Documented hop
  • Architecture only
  • Pointed, not quoted
  • Not this form
  • Unproven

This is a pattern grid over cited instruments, not a completed worldwide fact. Hover a cell where a note exists. Open a sticker for the quoted clause.

  • Criminal speech · Live, cited

    Hate-propaganda limbs (CA s.319, DE §130, UK POA) can be charged as antisemitism. Not a listed-speech offence. Not Israel §24.

  • Education · Live, cited

    A quoted institutional duty occupies education. Official theory is hostile environment / deliberate indifference — not a listed-speech offence. Cited intensity includes Title VI after October 7. A live education cell is not capture of schools.

  • Employment · Documented hop

    Documented hop of the overlay onto employment theory (cited: Title VII investigation of a campus as employer, 5 Mar 2025). Still campus, now as workplace. A hop is not capture of the employment sector. Not a listed-speech offence.

  • Other funded · Architecture only

    Some quoted funding-condition statutes already cover every funded operator (cited: 42 U.S.C. §2000d-4a). Architecture, not a listed-speech offence, not completed spread, and not capture. Non-campus intensity dataset Unproven.

Cited venues for this sticker

4 venues with a cited mark. Open a region, then a country. Unproven cells stay off this list. A dash is a cited finding that this form is not the quoted law.

  • Crime — criminal speech or hate offence, cited
  • Duty — institutional / funding / platform duty
  • Def. — working definition imported
  • Prog. — programme, not a statute
  • — not this form

Keep the layers apart.

Supported

Speech crime

Some venues write a listed-speech offence around listed organizations and acts. Israel §24 and UK s.1 / s.12 are examples. The United States has no citizen equivalent for independent public speech next to designation.

Supported

Civil-rights condition

Title VI CRA, Title VII employment, EO 13899 / 14188, and the DOJ Task Force police institutions and workplaces. Official theory is hostile environment / deliberate indifference — not a listed-speech offence.

Supported

Training exchange

GILEE (1992) and JINSA’s Law Enforcement Exchange / Homeland Security Program (2002) send US law-enforcement executives to train with Israeli counterparts. They are programs, not statutes, and they are not speech crimes.

Inference

Actor overlay

NGOs, institutes, philanthropies, and official partners can carry a sticker into governance, commercial pressure, grants, or enforcement without writing a speech crime. Existence is Supported where cited. Influence is usually Inference. Funding control and capture stay Unproven.

Education is intensity, not a statutory cage

Supported

Supported architecture

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance — colleges, but also HHS, HUD, DOT, USDA, and every other funded operator. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 defines 'program or activity' as all operations of an entity any part of which receives federal money. The DOJ Task Force’s first priority is schools and campuses. That is a targeting choice, not a limit in the statute.

Inference

Inference — structural risk

Once a contextual hostile-environment test is in active use in one funded sector, the same statutory language is available in every other funded sector without a new listed-speech offence. That is a structural risk, not a completed migration.

Unproven

Unproven — do not speak as if done

A primary dataset of antisemitism-Title-VI enforcement against non-campus sectors (hospitals, transit, housing, local government as such) is not attached. Do not speak as if the spread has already happened.

What is and is not spreading

Not happening

Supported

A new federal listed-speech offence, or a completed, documented migration of antisemitism-Title-VI enforcement into non-campus funded sectors as a primary dataset.

Happening inside education

Supported

Title VI OCR intensity after October 7; EO 14188 all-agency inventory with a campus-first Task Force; Title VII used on campus employees; two House education-funding vehicles that are not law.

Already true outside education, without new law

Supported

Title VI already covers every federally funded program. INA endorse/espouse already covers non-citizens. §2339B already covers coordinated support. §241 is already a general civil-rights conspiracy statute. Designation already expands those rules.

Structural risk

Inference

The same discretionary hostile-environment test, once normalized in education, can be pointed at any other funded operator without Congress writing a listed-speech offence. That is Inference, not a completed spread.

Tools the Department of Justice is pointing at

  • Supported

    Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism

    Live executive direction — 3 February 2025

    Formed pursuant to EO 14188. Coordinated through DOJ Civil Rights. First priority: root out anti-Semitic harassment in schools and on college campuses. Members include Education and HHS. Campus-first is official. All-agency inventory is also official.

    Primary source
  • Supported

    18 U.S.C. §241 — conspiracy against rights

    Live criminal statute, not education-only

    EO 14188 §3(c) encourages the Attorney General to employ civil-rights enforcement authorities, such as 18 U.S.C. 241, to combat anti-Semitism. §241 is a conspiracy to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate a person in the free exercise of a federal right. Maximum 10 years; life if death or listed aggravators. It is not a listed-speech offence. Charging independent public speech next to designation as §241 antisemitism is Unproven as a conviction record in this pack.

    Primary source
  • Supported

    Title VII hop — campus as workplace

    Live statute; 5 March 2025 UC investigation

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §2000e, prohibits employment discrimination on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Religion is on the face of Title VII; it is not on the face of Title VI. DOJ opened a Title VII pattern-or-practice investigation of the University of California as an employer of faculty and staff. That is a hop from student-funding theory to employment theory. It is still inside the campus complex.

    Primary source

Training exchanges — programs, not statutes

Exchange program — not a statuteSupported

GILEE

Georgia International Law Enforcement Exchange

Peer-to-peer executive training. US police chiefs, sheriffs, and command staff train with Israel Police and other counterparts. Official mission: law-enforcement executive development, anti-terrorism training since founding (originally 1996 Olympics), and 'protection of civil rights.' GILEE states it is recognized by DOJ and Treasury as a professional education program.

Not a statute. Not a speech crime. Not Title VI. Not an INA bar. Graduation from GILEE does not, by itself, change Brandenburg, Holder, or §2339B.

Program page
Exchange program — not a statuteSupported

JINSA LEEP / HSP

Jewish Institute for National Security of America — Law Enforcement Exchange Program / Homeland Security Program

Post-9/11 best-practices exchange. Senior US officers (federal, state, municipal) travel to Israel to study prevention and response. JINSA has also run US-side LEEP conferences with IACP / PERF / sheriffs’ associations.

Not a statute. Not a speech crime. JINSA is an advocacy institute with a training program. Existence and executive reach are Supported. 'Capture' of US law-enforcement pipelines is Unproven as a primary dataset.

Program page

The dates run the other way

  1. Title VI CRA — any federally funded program or activity

    Civil-rights

  2. JINSA founded

    Advocacy

  3. Civil Rights Restoration Act — entire-entity 'program or activity'

    Civil-rights

  4. GILEE founded at Georgia State

    Training

  5. JINSA LEEP launched

    Training

  6. EO 13899 — IHRA as evidence under Title VI, with a First Amendment saving clause

    Civil-rights

  7. OCR / complaint surge after October 7 — education is the loud venue

    Intensity

  8. EO 14188 — all-agency inventory; AG encouraged to use 18 U.S.C. §241

    Civil-rights

  9. DOJ Task Force — first priority schools and campuses

    Intensity

  10. DOJ Title VII investigation of UC as employer — campus as workplace

    Hop, still campus

  11. H.R. 4795 passed House — not law. H.R. 8476 reported — not law. Both education-funding vehicles.

    Pending

How to read this

The badge is the claim. The sentence is the fact. Unproven and Disputed stay where they are.

SupportedOfficial theory of an antisemitism overlay remains institutional discrimination. It is not a listed-speech offence by other means.

UnprovenGILEE and JINSA exist as training exchanges. Capture of a law-enforcement pipeline is Unproven.

SupportedTitle VI intensity is education. The statute already covers every federally funded program — it does not stay in education as a statutory matter.

DisputedMotive, overbreadth, and a single directing agenda are Disputed.

Quoted clauses

Also in the matrix
Live statuteSupportedOverlayAntisemitism

42 U.S.C. §2000d-4a

Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987

Target
Every operation of an entity any part of which receives federal financial assistance
Test
Title VI is not an education statute. Education is where it is loud. The definition already covers state and local government, colleges, school systems, and entire corporations.
Max
Funding termination / refusal across the entity, not only the assisted slice
Live executive orderSupportedOverlayAntisemitism

§3(c)

Executive Order 14188

Target
Attorney General civil-rights criminal authorities, including 18 U.S.C. §241
Test
Encouragement to employ existing conspiracy-against-rights authority to combat anti-Semitism. Not a new crime. Not limited to campuses.
Max
Points at §241 (10 years; life if death or listed aggravators)
Live statuteSupportedOverlayAntisemitism

Conspiracy against rights

18 U.S.C. §241

Target
Two or more persons who conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate anyone in the free exercise of a federal right
Test
Conspiracy against a right secured by the Constitution or federal law. Not a listed-speech test. Not Brandenburg. Not limited to schools.
Max
10 years; any term of years or life if death, kidnapping, or listed sex offenses; death-eligible if death results
Live executive orderSupportedOverlayAntisemitism

3 February 2025

DOJ Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism

Target
First priority: anti-Semitic harassment in schools and on college campuses
Test
Multi-agency (DOJ, Education, HHS). Coordinated through Civil Rights Division. Campus-first is official direction.
Max
Existing Title VI / Title VII / criminal civil-rights authorities — no new crime created
Working definition — not a statuteSupportedOverlayAntisemitism

Non-legally binding working definition, 26 May 2016

IHRA working definition of antisemitism

Target
A certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews
Test
Not a statute. Becomes operational when a state, university, or agency imports it as evidence (US: EO 13899). Examples are illustrative, including some Israel-related speech. First Amendment saving clause in EO 13899 §2(b).
Max
n/a — not a statute

Radio

Radio Paradise