No new US citizen glorification crime attached. Bills are not statutes: H.R. 4795 passed the House on 3 September 2026 and is not law; H.R. 8476 was reported, has not passed the House, and is not law; Canada C-34 is first reading, not law. List growth is speech-adjacent. Official Title VI theory remains hostile environment / deliberate indifference.
SupportedSupported. A primary instrument is attached for this slot — statute, order, gazette, or official page, with a URL. Every jurisdiction.
InferenceInference. A structural reading of how machinery can travel. Allowed. Must stay labeled. Not a statute.
UnprovenUnproven. No primary record for this slot yet. Capture, amounts, hops, and citizen-facing outcomes stay open until quoted.
DisputedDisputed. Live disagreement on motive, overbreadth, or a directing agenda — in any venue. Keep the label.
What attached after 7 October 2023 — and where there is still no new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue.
Official events only. As of 5 September 2026. Holder is coordination, not applause.
Already live
These were not invented after October 7.
Brandenburg, Holder, the INA endorse / espouse bar, Title VI CRA, EO 13899, UK Terrorism Act 2006 s.1, and Israel §24 were already in force. The 2023 NCHI Code is the England-and-Wales overlay without a crime. The timeline does not pretend they arrived with the attacks.
1964
Statute · United States · Already live
Supported
2 July 1964
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Live statute
Already live. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Official legal theory of later antisemitism enforcement is institutional hostile environment / deliberate indifference — not a citizen speech crime, and no new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. Title VI is not an education-only statute.
Already live. The citizen-speech floor: the constitutional guarantees of free speech do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce it. Independent abstract advocacy is protected. This doctrine was not invented after October 7.
Already live. The immigration tool is already statute: any alien who endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization is inadmissible. It is a status rule for non-citizens, not Brandenburg, and no new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. Post-2025 screening intensification is official direction. Individual-case counts remain Unproven without a primary statistical release.
INA §212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VII), 8 U.S.C. §1182(a)(3)(B)(i)(VII)
Already live. A statement a reasonable person would understand as direct or indirect encouragement of terrorism. Glorification counts only if members of the public could reasonably infer the conduct should be emulated by them in existing circumstances. Praise is not enough. Maximum 15 years on indictment. This is a listed-speech offence.
Already live. Holder reaches speech that is training, expert advice, or service provided to, under the direction of, or in coordination with a designated FTO. Independent advocacy stays outside §2339B. The Court: plaintiffs may say anything they wish on any topic. Holder is coordination, not applause. It is not a listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue.
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1, 25–26 (2010)
Already live. Three speech offenses, not one: identification with a terrorist organization is §24(a); a direct call to commit a terrorist act is §24(b)(1); praise, sympathy, or identification with a terrorist act is §24(b)(2). The post-October 7 add is the later consumption offense, not this 5776-2016 core. Date attached is the Library of Congress monitor on the 2016 legislation.
Already live. Directs agencies, in Title VI CRA enforcement, to consider the IHRA working definition and its contemporary examples to the extent useful as evidence of discriminatory intent, and not to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under Federal law or under the First Amendment. Directs enforcement of existing Title VI. No new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. IHRA remains a working definition, not a statute.
Enforcement direction · United Kingdom · Already live
Supported
3 June 2023
England and Wales NCHI Code of Practice
Live official manual
Already live. Non-crime hate incidents apply a classification overlay with no criminal offence. The June 2023 Home Secretary’s Code is live. Personal data of the subject should be recorded only if the incident presents a real risk of significant harm, or a real risk of a future criminal offence, against individuals or groups with a particular characteristic. This is overlay without a crime. A later replacement was announced; revocation is Unproven.
NCHI Code of Practice (June 2023); College of Policing APP
Israel added a temporary consumption offense and later extended its sunset. The United States intensified existing funding, immigration, and list tools, and moved two House vehicles that are not law. Canada enacted a hate overlay. England and Wales announced an NCHI replacement; the 2023 Code is live until revocation is attached.
2023
Announcement · Israel
Inference
7 October 2023
Hamas attacks of 7 October 2023
Context — not a statute
Context marker, not a legal instrument. Executive Order 14188 later names the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 7, 2023, against the people of Israel as the wake in which existing US civil-rights tools were intensified. The attacks did not write a new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue, and they did not enact H.R. 4795 or H.R. 8476 — those bills are still not law.
Exec. Order No. 14188 (Jan. 29, 2025) — official US naming of the attacks
Israel Amendment No. 9 consumption offense published
Temporary / sunset
Combating Terrorism Law §24(c1): one year of imprisonment for a person who systematically and continuously consumes publications of a specified terrorist organization in circumstances indicating identification with that organization. Random, good-faith, research, and public-information uses are excluded. Temporary provision. This is a post-October 7 add to an already-live §24.
Combating Terrorism Law (Amendment No. 9 and Temporary Order), 5784-2023, §24(c1), published 12 Nov 2023
The consumption offense was enacted as a temporary order. Original two-year sunset ran from publication on 12 November 2023. Carry the sunset whenever the offense is named. The later Knesset extension is a separate instrument event.
Combating Terrorism Law (Amendment No. 9 and Temporary Order), 5784-2023, §24(c1); original two-year sunset from 12 Nov 2023
Executive Order 14188, Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism
Live executive order
Reaffirms Executive Order 13899 and directs additional measures to advance that policy after October 7, including an agency inventory of civil and criminal authorities and encouragement to employ 18 U.S.C. §241. No new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. Official theory remains institutional discrimination — hostile environment / deliberate indifference — not a citizen speech crime. Convictions for independent praise under §241 remain Unproven in this pack.
Enforcement direction — no new listed-speech offence
Formed pursuant to EO 14188. First priority: anti-Semitic harassment in schools and on college campuses. Multi-agency, coordinated through the Civil Rights Division. Existing Title VI / Title VII / criminal civil-rights authorities. No new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. Official theory remains institutional discrimination, not a citizen speech crime.
DOJ Title VII investigation of the University of California
Enforcement direction — still campus
The Task Force announced a civil pattern-or-practice investigation of the University of California as employer under Title VII, assessing an alleged antisemitic hostile work environment for professors, staff, and other employees. Religion is on the face of Title VII. This is the documented hop from student-funding theory to employment theory. Still the campus complex. Official theory remains hostile environment. A non-campus antisemitism-Title-VI dataset is Unproven.
Knesset extends Amendment No. 9 through 30 November 2027
Temporary / extended through 30 Nov 2027
Second and third readings extended the temporary consumption offense until 30 November 2027 (19–6–1). Carry the sunset date every time §24(c1) is named. Still not the core §24 identification and praise offenses. Proposed Amendment No. 11 (lower the §24 threshold to ‘reasonable possibility’) is Unproven-as-law until gazette confirmation.
Year-level pin. CRS IF10613: in 2025, more entities were added to the FTO list than in any previous year since its inception in 1997. Designation expands the reach of existing §2339B and INA rules. List growth is speech-adjacent. It does not write a new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. Counts move. Re-check Federal Register FTO deltas.
CRS In Focus IF10613, The Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) List
College of Policing / NPCC NCHI replacement announced
Announced — revocation Unproven
College of Policing / NPCC announced a replacement approach on 31 March 2026. The current NCHI system would be replaced; the Home Office would revoke the 2023 Code through the Crime and Policing Bill. Treat the June 2023 Code as live until revocation is attached. Revocation is Unproven. This remains overlay without a crime.
Canada Bill C-34, Safe Social Media Act — first reading
First reading — not law
Canada Bill C-34, Safe Social Media Act, first reading 10 June 2026, is not law. It would enact a Digital Safety Act and a Digital Safety Commission of Canada Act. Dead Bill C-63 is not law. Do not speak as if a Digital Safety Commission exists.
Bill C-34, 45th Parl., 1st sess., first reading 10 June 2026 — not law
Canada Combatting Hate Act (Bill C-9) — Royal Assent
Royal Assent — in force 18 July 2026
Canada Combatting Hate Act (Bill C-9) received Royal Assent 18 June 2026 and came into force 18 July 2026. Statutory definition of hatred, a listed-entity symbols offence, and access-obstruction offences. Official framing named antisemitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, and transphobia together. Bundling is Supported as official speech. Legal identity of those stickers is false. This is a hate overlay, not Israel §24, and no new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue.
Combatting Hate Act (Bill C-9), Royal Assent 18 June 2026
C-9 came into force 18 July 2026. Canada s.83.221 remains counselling a terrorism offence, not glorification. The live overlay is s.319 plus C-9. Canada Bill C-34, Safe Social Media Act, first reading 10 June 2026, is not law.
Combatting Hate Act, in force 18 July 2026; Criminal Code s.319(7), s.319(2.2)
H.R. 8476, No Antisemitism in Education Act of 2026, was reported 20 August 2026 (Union Calendar 660), has not passed the House, and is not law. It would require funded schools and colleges to treat antisemitic discrimination as vigorously as other Title VI CRA grounds. No new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. An earlier Fine bill, H.R. 6186, used the same short title. The live vehicle is H.R. 8476.
H.R. 8476, 119th Cong. (reported 20 Aug. 2026, Union Calendar 660) — not law
H.R. 4795, Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act of 2026, passed the House 237–169 on 3 September 2026 (Roll no. 295) and is not law. It would add HEA student-aid and HEA Title VI international-education certifications. HEA Title VI is not CRA Title VI. No new listed-speech offence for citizen speech in this venue. Not enacted until the Senate acts and the President signs, or a conference produces an enacted text.
H.R. 4795, 119th Cong. (passed House 3 Sept. 2026, 237–169, Roll no. 295) — not law